Probably we’ll have little anti-nanobot nanobots though too, so celebrities who want privacy will have billions strong nanoscale dogfights between bots around them like dust in the air.

the problem with the 50’s blacklist though is that there were SO MANY PEOPLE on that list that were not deserving of it. A rumor starts, then all of a sudden you’re blacklisted.

My personal belief is that the government shouldn’t certify marriages at all. If they wanted to give a tax break to couples raising children, they could have a civil union type thing I guess, but I think that marriage itself should be left up to the people involved and whatever their church’s position is.

It’s interesting to watch though, with the Hollywood blacklist parallels and the gay protesters outside black churches. It’s only going to get even uglier, and Obama will have to say something about it eventually. No matter what he says on the topic, someone is gonna be pissed off. I can’t wait.

BUT….in this case….the people of California have spoken…have they not? I mean, say what you want, unprecedented amounts of black and latino voters at the polls (who historically are anti-gay), shady big money backers of banning gay marriage, whatever….but in the end, isnt it enough that the people have spoken?

Let’s hope our country doesn’t have a similar fate to the Knicks!

If I’m wrong about the election result, I’ll be happy to admit it tomorrow. Are you going to come back and admit you were wrong if I end up being right?

According to the paper, “The Los Angeles Times did not publish the videotape because it was provided to us by a confidential source who did so on the condition that we not release it. The Times keeps its promises to sources.”

You’ll be eating crow on the election results tonight as well.

Regardless, we’ll know tonight.